JOIN NOOZIT      Login Help
 
Noozit: don't blog it, Noozit! Noozit: don't blog it, Noozit!
Liked this? Say Thanks!   
Applause from 21 readers lightning bolt
Share
You haven't invited anyone
Visits from 0 of 0 recipients: 0%
Related Articles
Hands from ACBL 2007 Fall Nationals - Tim Lundeen My Real Name 1 comment
Applause from 8 readers lightning bolt
Interesting hands from world-class players
More play hands, LM pairs final San Francisco - chip My Real Name 0 comments
Applause from 8 readers lightning bolt
Found time to watch a few more hands in the open (formerly Men's) LM pairs final...
Shanghai, bridge for a change - chip My Real Name 2 comments
Applause from 6 readers lightning bolt
Interesting hand from the 2007 transnational teams.
Liberty, where? - magicmayate 6 comments
Applause from 7 readers lightning bolt
Interested in human rights? This just might be for you.
Winning the BAM Teams in San Francisco - chip My Real Name 2 comments
Applause from 6 readers
A well bid hand, and how we won a national bridge championships.
Winning the San Francisco BAM part 2 - chip My Real Name 0 comments
Applause from 7 readers
Two interesting hands on the way to winning the teams in San Francisco.
Which grand? How Grand! - chip My Real Name 0 comments
Applause from 5 readers
How to be greedy and win a bridge hand. Bidding and play tactics in the Reisinger.
Which Squeeze, Which Grand? - chip My Real Name 1 comment
Applause from 3 readers
Bidding and play puzzle from the Spingold KO.
Lost suit in the national swiss - chip My Real Name 0 comments
Applause from 2 readers
Losing a suit, winning a match, losing the event

All articles by Bob Hamman
[Hamman, Bob]

Be careful where you tread, you may leave footprints.

By Bob Hamman My Real Name big star Featured Noozer
Published: 26 November 2007 09:46 am

After two passes and the dreaded multi 2 diamonds, I didn't have enough for a 2NT bid, but since LHO was a passed hand and the vulnerability was favorable, I felt that was more representative than the classic double with a balanced 13-15.

West led the and switched to the unreadable low spade. East made a good play by ducking and now the ball was in my court. I clearly needed to find the or you could turn out the lights. So what did I know.

First the opening leader tried a high club. This looks a lot like a 4+ card suit. Second he bid vulnerable with a presumed strong NT over partner. 

Third he was a passed hand.

If he had 3 little spades, he is a braver man than I. If he had the he was unlikely to have the .

So I played off three rounds of diamonds, noting the 3-3 break and held my breath when I played a heart to the J. It held, else this story would have not seen the light of day, and another elegant was chalked up when would have required much kindness from the opponents to make. Incidentally, I agree with the bid, but it does remind one that in bridge as in life the free lunch is hard to come by. My decision to play was a close one and certainly might have worked out badly. Partner could have doubled for takeout and I might have collected a penalty, or bid or . We will never know.

 

 

 

Liked this? Say thanks!   
Or bookmark or share it.
Jimb100 - Nov 23, 2007 8:26 ameye
Great analysis - I played some bridge sessions a few years ago with Doug Dang, an excellent San Francisco Bay Area bridge player who recently passed away. Doug had played on some teams with Bob in the past and paid Bob the highest complement when he stated: "Just put Bob in 3NT and you can count on getting a top or close to top on the board every time" This analysis is just one example of Doug's comment about Bob's incredible ability.
TMcG - Nov 26, 2007 12:55 pmeye
I'm looking forward to more articles from Bob -- we don't get to see his thoughts in print very often. Slightly OT, I played in the A/X Swiss in SF last night and came up against a Norwegian team that played Multi and Tartan 2s. They were very nice and provided us with printouts of the ACBL standard defenses. I was a little sad that they didn't open any two bids during the 8 bd match. It would have been fun to play against those treatments. Bob, maybe you can lobby the ACBL to loosen up on restrictions against these bids? We also played (in a pairs game) against a pair that used a weak 2C opener. Again, it didn't come up, but it's nice to see a little innovation at the table (even if Al Roth was playing that particular bid 50 years ago )
Please log in to post a comment.